ITPub博客

首页 > 数据库 > Oracle > 10g和9i执行计划差异

10g和9i执行计划差异

原创 Oracle 作者:m77m78 时间:2007-05-14 21:35:14 0 删除 编辑

在oracle9i中执行计划如下分析:

SQL> select ename,dname  from emp, dept  where emp.deptno=dept.deptno   and dept.dname in ('ACCOUNTING','RESEARCH','SALES','OPERATIONS');
  
  Execution Plan
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  0   SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE
  1  0  NESTED LOOPS
  2  1   TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP'
  3  1   TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'DEPT'
  4  3    INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'PK_DEPT' (UNIQUE)

[@more@]

在oracle9i中执行计划如下分析:

SQL> select ename,dname  from emp, dept  where emp.deptno=dept.deptno   and dept.dname in ('ACCOUNTING','RESEARCH','SALES','OPERATIONS');
  
  Execution Plan
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  0   SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE
  1  0  NESTED LOOPS
  2  1   TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP'
  3  1   TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'DEPT'
  4  3    INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'PK_DEPT' (UNIQUE)
  
  关于前面的两个数字,第一个是状态ID,第二个是父ID。
  
  就是如下所示:0-->1-->2
             |
             |-->3-->4
  在上图里,0的执行依靠1,1的执行又依赖2和3,2是没有子ID的,所以2最先执行,然后是4,在然后是3;然后2和3的结果传回1。

在oracle10g中执行计划的显示结果发生了改变:

SQL> set linesize 200
SQL> select count(*) from site_connect_detail;

COUNT(*)
----------
16250151


执行计划

----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2918895406

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 15290 (4)| 00:03:04 | | |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | | | |
| 2 | PARTITION RANGE ALL| | 14M| 15290 (4)| 00:03:04 | 1 | 44 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SITE_CONNECT_DETAIL | 14M| 15290 (4)| 00:03:04 | 1 | 44 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
74696 consistent gets
74052 physical reads
0 redo size
411 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed

我们可以按照the rightmost-uppermost(最右最上) operation of an explain 规则来分析执行计划。

来自 “ ITPUB博客 ” ,链接:https://blog.itpub.net/34329/viewspace-914977/ ,如需转载,请注明出处,否则将追究法律责任。

请登录后发表评论 登录
全部评论

注册时间:2008-04-25

  • 博文量
    168
  • 访问量
    764675