所以、只要基表索引使用得当、便是对视图的最大安慰和馈赠

hr@ORCL> create view v_employees as select * from employees;

View created.

hr@ORCL> create index idx_v_employeess on v_employees(EMPLOYEE_ID);
create index idx_v_employeess on v_employees(EMPLOYEE_ID)
                                 *
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01702: a view is not appropriate here

     ㈡ 小表使用索引有意义吗
        
        一般我们会认为、小表全表扫描可能性能更好、但是、请看下面一个简单测试

hr@ORCL> select * from t where y=\'9999a\';


Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1601196873

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation         | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |      |     3 |    90 |    57   (4)| 00:00:01 |
|*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T    |     3 |    90 |    57   (4)| 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter("Y"=\'9999a\')

Note
-----
   - dynamic sampling used for this statement


Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          0  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
        249  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
        462  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        385  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
          1  rows processed

/* y上建立索引 */

hr@ORCL> create index idx_t_y on t (y);

Index created.

hr@ORCL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname=>\'HR\',tabname=>\'T\',estimate_percent=>100,cascade=>TRUE,no_invalidate=>false);

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

hr@ORCL> select * from t where y=\'9999a\';


Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2903481642

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                   | Name    | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |         |     1 |    11 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T       |     1 |    11 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX_T_Y |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   2 - access("Y"=\'9999a\')


Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          0  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
          4  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
        466  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        385  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
          1  rows processed


/* 逻辑读从 249一下子卡到4、虽然这个表有10w行、但也绝对不是大表*/

        小表 DML 不会很多、因此、不会有维护索引带来的额外开销、这是第二个理由
        
        综上、不使用索引访问小表、效率未必是最高、这和表记录大小、记录的分布有很大关系

By David Lin 
2013-06-07
Good Luck