ITPub博客

首页 > 数据库 > Oracle > 记一次打开数据库慢原因分析过程

记一次打开数据库慢原因分析过程

原创 Oracle 作者:pingdanorcale 时间:2023-03-13 15:22:29 0 删除 编辑

最近在测试生产数据库时发现数据库在open过程很长慢,大概持续20分钟左右,有时持续1-2个小时。日志如下:

Fri Nov 23 10:53:51 2018 
SMON: enabling tx recovery 
Database Characterset is AL32UTF8 
Fri Nov 23 10:54:02 2018 
Decreasing number of real time LMS from 2 to 0 
Fri Nov 23 10:54:05 2018 
No Resource Manager plan active 
Fri Nov 23 10:54:47 2018 
Starting background process GTX0 
Fri Nov 23 10:54:47 2018 
GTX0 started with pid=41, OS id=14549130 
  Starting background process RCBG 
Fri Nov 23 10:54:48 2018<================== 
RCBG started with pid=43, OS id=14811234 
  replication_dependency_tracking turned off (no async multimaster replication found) 
Fri Nov 23 14:07:01 2018<====================
从RCBG进程启动到QMNC进程启动之间间隔了180分钟左右,而其他open过程占用一分钟左右。 
Starting background process QMNC 
Fri Nov 23 14:07:01 2018 
QMNC started with pid=31, OS id=28246190 
  Fri Nov 23 14:07:57 2018 
Completed: alter database open 
。

为了进一步分析 RCBG 到 QMNC 启动慢的原因,做如下日志日志跟踪:

1. 做oracel hanganalyze

数据库启动到mount 状态

在看到alert log打印如下字样时,在另外的sqlplus窗口下收集3次,间隔2~3分钟收集一次:

步骤如下:

sqlplus / as sysdba

oradebug setmypid

oradebug -G all dump systemstate 267

oradebug -G all hanganalyze 2

等2~3分钟

oradebug -G all dump systemstate 267

oradebug -G all hanganalyze 2

等2~3分钟

oradebug -G all dump systemstate 267

oradebug -G all hanganalyze 2

oradebug tracefile_name

alter 日志产生如下文件

No Resource Manager plan active 
Fri Nov 23 15:09:25 2018 
Starting background process GTX0 
Fri Nov 23 15:09:25 2018 
GTX0 started with pid=41, OS id=8585312 
  Starting background process RCBG 
Fri Nov 23 15:09:26 2018 
RCBG started with pid=43, OS id=18809034 
  replication_dependency_tracking turned off (no async multimaster replication found) 
Fri Nov 23 15:39:33 2018 
System State dumped to trace file /u01/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/erpdb/ erpdb 1/trace/erpdb 1_diag_31850618.trc

从文件上看oracle 在open过程中等待如下

1.   
-- Trace File -- 
Starting Systemstate 1 
......................................... 
Ass.Awk Version 1.0.31 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
Source file : symbols1_diag_31850618.trc 

System State 1 (2018-11-23 15:39:32.932) 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
1: [DEAD] 
2: waiting for 'pmon timer' 
3: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
4: waiting for 'VKTM Logical Idle Wait' 
5: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
6: 
7: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
8: waiting for 'PING' 
9: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
10: waiting for 'DIAG idle wait' 
11: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
12: waiting for 'ges remote message'<===lmd 
13: waiting for 'gcs remote message'<===lms 
14: waiting for 'gcs remote message'<===lms 
15: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
16: waiting for 'GCR sleep' 
17: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
18: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
19: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
20: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
21: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
22: waiting for 'smon timer' 
23: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
24: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
25: waiting for 'ASM background timer' 
26: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
27: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
28: 
29: 
30: waiting for 'wait for unread message on broadcast channel' 
31: waiting for 'class slave wait' 
32: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
33: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
34: waiting for 'db file scattered read' (0x4f,0xa2766,0xb) 
35: waiting for 'rdbms ipc reply' (from_process=6)[IPC 6] 
37: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
38: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
39: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
40: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
41: waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' 
43: waiting for 'wait for unread message on broadcast channel' 

2.     

flags2: (0x409) -/-/INC 
DID: , short-term DID: 
txn branch: 0x0 
edition#: 0 oct: 0, prv: 0, sql: 0x0, psql: 0x0, user: 0/SYS 
ksuxds FALSE at location: 0 
service name: SYS$BACKGROUND 
Current Wait Stack: 
0: waiting for 'gcs remote message' 
waittime=0x1e, poll=0x0, event=0x0 
wait_id=51479 seq_num=51480 snap_id=1 
wait times: snap=0.000577 sec, exc=0.000577 sec, total=0.000577 sec 
wait times: max=0.030000 sec, heur=31 min 42 sec<==============
应该是实例启动到dump时总共等待时间,这儿说明私网gcs消息传输可能有问题。 

 

为了排除私有网卡的问题部署oswatch,从oswatch收集的信息看,网络和资源都没有问题。

 2. 为了进一步确定原因

truss -aefdo /tmp/truss.out sqlplus / as sysdba

alter database open;

从日志上分析可以看到

14876838: 56950981: 2.0001: kread(9, "01 -\0\006\0\0\0\0\011 i".., 8208) (sleeping...) 
21954596: 92471451: 2.0001: kread(0, "\n l t e r d a t a b a".., 4096) (sleeping...) 
21954596: 92471451: kread(0, " e x i t\n d a t a b a".., 4096) = 5 
21954596: 92471451: 1344.6921: kfcntl(1, F_GETFL, 0x0000000000000008) = 67110914<=== 
从它前面的kread读取的终端输入是exit来看应该是已经完成了open执行推出之后的os call了,所以上面的1344.6921秒是不能计入open过程的,排除这个之后来看,主要问题就是aio了, listio64 数目高达123644次,而单次等待从0.0003到0.5271s不等 
14876838: 56950981: kpread(24, 0x07000107C5755000, 4096, 0x0000004FBAD2A000, 0x000000000000007D) = 4096 
14876838: 56950981: kpread(24, 0x07000107C5E14000, 4096, 0x000000E41E85F000, 0x000000000000007D) = 4096 
14876838: 56950981: 0.5271: listio64(0x0000000010000004, 0x000000000FFFFFFF, 0x00000000FFFCC1E0, 0x0000000000000001, 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000, 0x00000001116E89A0, 0x0000000000000040) = 0x0000000000000000
,


---Continue--- 
  有一点还是很奇怪,按理open的时候已经完成了crash recovery了,此时对数据文件只有读没有写了,但为何您这里出来这么多 kpread,还是令人不解。 为什么从RCBG进程启动到QMNC进程启动之间间隔很长时间那,而其他后台进程open过程占用一分钟左右。
从上边的分析,问题又回到了原点。难道是oracle bug,

为了进一步确认问题,在mos搜到如下一篇文章:

Procedure to Manually Coalesce All the IOTs / Indexes Associated with Advanced Queueing Tables to Maintain Enqueue / Dequeue Performance; Reduce QMON CPU Usage and Redo Generation ( 文档 ID 271855.1)

为了验证文章的可靠性,通过此文章提供的脚本,进行修复,数据库能正常OPEN,并且很快。日志如下:

Database Characterset is AL32UTF8

No Resource Manager plan active

Starting background process GTX0

Fri Nov 23 16:39:33 2018 

GTX0 started with pid=36, OS id=16056540

Starting background process RCBG

Fri Nov 23 16:41:23 2018 

RCBG started with pid=37, OS id=26214482

replication_dependency_tracking turned off (no async multimaster replication found)

Starting background process QMNC

Fri Nov 23 16:42:23 2018 

QMNC started with pid=39, OS id=14287094

Fri Nov 23 16:43:33 2018 

Completed: ALTER DATABASE OPEN

 

这个案例的后续是,如果经常使用AQ,数据库可以不定期做碎片整理。


来自 “ ITPUB博客 ” ,链接:https://blog.itpub.net/10201716/viewspace-2939378/ ,如需转载,请注明出处,否则将追究法律责任。

上一篇: Group by 优化
请登录后发表评论 登录
全部评论

注册时间:2009-01-02

  • 博文量
    158
  • 访问量
    221220