ITPub博客

首页 > 数据库 > MySQL > 为什么MySQL没有负载,但交易却跑不动?

为什么MySQL没有负载,但交易却跑不动?

MySQL 作者:数据库工作笔记 时间:2023-10-31 09:35:13 0 删除 编辑

来源:oracleace


在MySQL的数据库中,我们有时会发现MySQL数据库明明没有负载,CPU、硬盘、内存和网络等资源都很空闲,但很多SQL都pending在哪儿,MySQL数据库无法处理交易。这是怎么回事呢?


关于号主,姚远:

  • Oracle ACE(Oracle和MySQL数据库方向)

  • 华为云最有价值专家

  • 《MySQL 8.0运维与优化》的作者

  • 拥有 Oracle 10g、12c和19c OCM等数十项数据库认证

  • 曾任IBM公司数据库部门经理

  • 20+年DBA经验,服务2万+客户

  • 精通C和Java,发明两项计算机专利


在数据库系统中出现这种情况通常是锁竞争造成的,MySQL数据库更加容易出现这种情况,因为它的存储层和服务层是分开的,我们来看锁竞争在MySQL 5.7和8.0里的表现和解决办法。

5.7版本中查询锁竞争

  在MySQL 8.0 之前,必须SET GLOBAL innodb_status_output_locks=ON后才能在SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS中查到数据锁,例如下面这个事务:








mysql> begin;Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from t1 where intcol1=0 for update;...900 rows in set (0.00 sec)

在SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS中查到








---TRANSACTION 7827, ACTIVE 11 sec222 lock struct(s), heap size 24784, 5720 row lock(s)MySQL thread id 9912, OS thread handle 139967683151616, query id 11123 localhost rootTABLE LOCK table `mysqlslap`.`t1` trx id 7827 lock mode IXRECORD LOCKS space id 25 page no 37 n bits 1056 index in_1 of table `mysqlslap`.`t1` trx id 7827 lock_mode X
...

修改了900行,却锁住了5720行。查询space id为25对应的对象:








mysql> select * from information_schema.INNODB_SYS_DATAFILES where space=25;+-------+--------------------+| SPACE | PATH               |+-------+--------------------+|    25 | ./mysqlslap/t1.ibd |+-------+--------------------+1 row in set (0.00 sec)

在另外一个session里执行




mysql> update t1 set intcol1=1 where intcol1=0;ERROR 1205 (HY000): Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction

查询锁的情况



















mysql> select * from information_schema.innodb_lock_waits;+-------------------+-------------------+-----------------+------------------+| requesting_trx_id | requested_lock_id | blocking_trx_id | blocking_lock_id |+-------------------+-------------------+-----------------+------------------+| 7829              | 7829:25:4:2       | 7827            | 7827:25:4:2      |+-------------------+-------------------+-----------------+------------------+1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from information_schema.innodb_locks;+-------------+-------------+-----------+-----------+------------------+-----------------+------------+-----------+----------+----------------+| lock_id     | lock_trx_id | lock_mode | lock_type | lock_table       | lock_index      | lock_space | lock_page | lock_rec | lock_data      |+-------------+-------------+-----------+-----------+------------------+-----------------+------------+-----------+----------+----------------+| 7829:25:4:2 | 7829        | X         | RECORD    | `mysqlslap`.`t1` | GEN_CLUST_INDEX |         25 |         4 |        2 | 0x000000000200 || 7827:25:4:2 | 7827        | X         | RECORD    | `mysqlslap`.`t1` | GEN_CLUST_INDEX |         25 |         4 |        2 | 0x000000000200 |+-------------+-------------+-----------+-----------+------------------+-----------------+------------+-----------+----------+----------------+2 rows in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

查询阻塞的线程:





















SELECT b.trx_mysql_thread_id             AS 'blocked_thread_id'       ,b.trx_query                      AS 'blocked_sql_text'       ,c.trx_mysql_thread_id             AS 'blocker_thread_id'      ,c.trx_query                       AS 'blocker_sql_text'      ,( Unix_timestamp() - Unix_timestamp(c.trx_started) )                               AS 'blocked_time' FROM   information_schema.innodb_lock_waits a     INNER JOIN information_schema.innodb_trx b          ON a.requesting_trx_id = b.trx_id     INNER JOIN information_schema.innodb_trx c          ON a.blocking_trx_id = c.trx_id WHERE  ( Unix_timestamp() - Unix_timestamp(c.trx_started) ) > 4; +-------------------+-----------------------------------------+-------------------+------------------+--------------+| blocked_thread_id | blocked_sql_text                        | blocker_thread_id | blocker_sql_text | blocked_time |+-------------------+-----------------------------------------+-------------------+------------------+--------------+|              9921 | update t1 set intcol1=1 where intcol1=0 |              9917 | NULL             |          782 |+-------------------+-----------------------------------------+-------------------+------------------+--------------+1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

根据线程号查询执行的SQL



















SELECT a.sql_text,        c.id,        d.trx_started FROM   performance_schema.events_statements_current a        join performance_schema.threads b          ON a.thread_id = b.thread_id        join information_schema.processlist c          ON b.processlist_id = c.id        join information_schema.innodb_trx d          ON c.id = d.trx_mysql_thread_id where c.id=9917ORDER  BY d.trx_started\G*************************** 1. row ***************************   sql_text: select * from t1 where intcol1=0 for update         id: 9917trx_started: 2023-05-26 13:24:591 row in set (0.00 sec)
注意这里查询出的SQL是阻塞事务的最后一条SQL,并不一定是阻塞的源头。

解决锁竞争

解决方法是针对where中的条件增加索引,使MySQL服务层的过滤能在存储层完成,例如


















mysql> create index in_1 on t1(intcol1);Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec)Records: 0  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0
mysql> show create table t1\G*************************** 1. row ***************************       Table: t1Create Table: CREATE TABLE `t1` (  `intcol1` int(32) DEFAULT NULL,  `intcol2` int(32) DEFAULT NULL,  `charcol1` varchar(128) DEFAULT NULL,  `charcol2` varchar(128) DEFAULT NULL,  `charcol3` varchar(128) DEFAULT NULL,  KEY `in_1` (`intcol1`)) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin11 row in set (0.00 sec)

再锁住同样的行








mysql> begin;Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from t1 where intcol1=0 for update;...900 rows in set (0.00 sec)

在SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS中查到









---TRANSACTION 7841, ACTIVE 15 sec155 lock struct(s), heap size 24784, 1801 row lock(s)MySQL thread id 9917, OS thread handle 139966608627456, query id 11227 localhost rootTABLE LOCK table `mysqlslap`.`t1` trx id 7841 lock mode IXRECORD LOCKS space id 25 page no 37 n bits 1056 index in_1 of table `mysqlslap`.`t1` trx id 7841 lock_mode X

...


被锁住的记录从之前的5720条减少到1801条。

有索引后执行计划也不同,加索引之前的执行计划









mysql> explain select * from t1 where intcol1=0 for update;+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+-------------+| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key  | key_len | ref  | rows | filtered | Extra       |+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+-------------+|  1 | SIMPLE      | t1    | NULL       | ALL  | NULL          | NULL | NULL    | NULL | 6143 |    10.00 | Using where |+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+-------------+1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

加了索引后的执行计划是:










mysql> explain select * from t1 where intcol1=0 for update;+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+-------+------+----------+-------+| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key  | key_len | ref   | rows | filtered | Extra |+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+-------+------+----------+-------+|  1 | SIMPLE      | t1    | NULL       | ref  | in_1          | in_1 | 5       | const |  900 |   100.00 | NULL  |+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+-------+------+----------+-------+1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

对比一下可以发现后者的Extra字段中没有“Using where”,因为过滤再存储层已经完成了。
生产中可以先 select 出 主键id,再用 主键id 去 update

8.0版本

从 MySQL 8.0 开始,performance_schema.data_locks显示 InnoDB 数据锁。具体参见拙作《MySQL 8.0运维于优化》第18章第3节“优化索引”。


来自 “ ITPUB博客 ” ,链接:https://blog.itpub.net/70027826/viewspace-2991976/ ,如需转载,请注明出处,否则将追究法律责任。

请登录后发表评论 登录
全部评论

注册时间:2023-03-16

  • 博文量
    371
  • 访问量
    295304