比较
RAID 0+1 - using 4 drives, two pairs are striped, and the results mirror each other. In this configuration, when one of the drives fails, it actually breaks the stipe that it belongs to, which in turn breaks the mirror... at this point, all you have is 1 stipe. At this point, if one drive fails, you are in trouble. To recover, the offending drive is removed, and the entire stipe needs to be resync'd. RAID 1+0 - using 4 drives, two pairs are mirrored, and the results are used to create a single stripe. In this configuration, when one of the drives fails, it only breaks one mirror, without affecting the stripe... at this point, only 1/2 of the stipe is mirrored... but if a 2nd drive failure were to occur, it has a 2-in-3 chance of occuring on the last mirror... if it does, you are still OK. To recover, the offending drive is removed, and only the mirror of 1/2 the stripe needs to be resync'd.
RAID 0+1 - using 4 drives, two pairs are striped, and the results mirror each other. In this configuration, when one of the drives fails, it actually breaks the stipe that it belongs to, which in turn breaks the mirror... at this point, all you have is 1 stipe. At this point, if one drive fails, you are in trouble. To recover, the offending drive is removed, and the entire stipe needs to be resync'd. RAID 1+0 - using 4 drives, two pairs are mirrored, and the results are used to create a single stripe. In this configuration, when one of the drives fails, it only breaks one mirror, without affecting the stripe... at this point, only 1/2 of the stipe is mirrored... but if a 2nd drive failure were to occur, it has a 2-in-3 chance of occuring on the last mirror... if it does, you are still OK. To recover, the offending drive is removed, and only the mirror of 1/2 the stripe needs to be resync'd.
来自 “ ITPUB博客 ” ，链接：https://blog.itpub.net/593324/viewspace-376173/ ，如需转载，请注明出处，否则将追究法律责任。
请登录后发表评论
登录
全部评论
最新文章
- [原]表空间热备模式下，数据文件是否仍在写入数据？
- 悬而未决之能否通过 exp/imp 执行特殊的数据更新？
- 在SQLServer中实现数据库A访问数据库B
- 使用db_nk_cache_size与Ora-02097,Ora-000384
- [转]在.NET中调用Oracle9i存储过程经验总结
- ORA-01194错误恢复方法一
- 新插入的数据为什么没有放在block的最后？（五）
- 今天阅完10g DataGuard的Concept and Admin
- [原]日志文件头信息分析
- [原创]求解：recursive calls，consistent gets，physical reads 都很高，如何分析SQL
