ITPub博客

首页 > Linux操作系统 > Linux操作系统 > Spring 2.5 Perfomance Improvements 200% 直逼 Guice

Spring 2.5 Perfomance Improvements 200% 直逼 Guice

原创 Linux操作系统 作者:梧桐雨—168 时间:2008-03-26 02:48:14 0 删除 编辑

  并发性能提升的原因之一是使用了 ConcurrentHashMap,原来的 Collections.synchronized(new HashMap()) 存在同步锁的性能瓶颈;

  如果你是用JDK 5.0或以上的版本,就可以直接得到这个性能的提升的好处了。

  或者下载 Emory concurrent utilities backport 加到 CLASSPATH 中

  http://dcl.mathcs.emory.edu/util/backport-util-concurrent/

  当然还要努力,越快越好啦。。。

  引用

  The upcoming Spring Framework version 2.5 will bring a 200% improvement for concurrent access over Spring 2.0.*. I used Crazy Bob's Semi Useless Benchmark ™ as a starting point. I fiddled with the code slightly to change the default behavior. from "prototype" to "singleton", and I saw that spring 2.5 was faster than Guice for singletons.

  Here are some benchmarks (there is variability based on the runs)

  * Spring 2.0 vs. guice 1.0:

  o Prototype: Single thread: Spring is 50-150X slower. Concurrent: Spring is 50-150X slower.

  o Singleton: Single thread: Spring 3X slower - 2X faster. Concurrent: Spring is 5-10X slower

  * Spring 2.0.6 vs. guice 1.0:

  o Prototype: Single thread: Spring is ~10X slower. Concurrent: Spring is 5X slower.

  o Singleton: Single thread: Spring 2X slower - 2X faster. Concurrent: Spring:Guice ~2:3

  * Spring 2.14m vs. guice 1.0:

  o Prototype: Single thread: Spring is 5-7X slower. Concurrent: Spring is 3-4X slower.

  o Singleton: Single thread: neck and neck. Concurrent: Spring is 1-1.5X faster

  * guice 1.0:

  o Prototype: Single thread vs. Concurrent: Concurrent might be a bit slower than single threaded

  o Singleton: Single thread vs. Concurrent: Concurrent is quite a bit faster than single threaded

  详细请见这里

  http://www.jroller.com/Solomon/entry/spring_2_5_perfomance_improvements

来自 “ ITPUB博客 ” ,链接:http://blog.itpub.net/13270562/viewspace-217888/,如需转载,请注明出处,否则将追究法律责任。

上一篇: 关于Ioc的思考
下一篇: Guice学习心得
请登录后发表评论 登录
全部评论

注册时间:2008-02-28

  • 博文量
    141
  • 访问量
    401828